Login Register
Forum Instructions

Welcome to the Gary Is Innocent Forum. You are free to read all the posts but to participate you must first register.
Once logged in you will see the following Icons to help you participate.  NOTE:  All personal information, as a result of your login, will NOT be distributed to any third parties for any reason.

Settings Button My Settings: To personalize your participation. Key areas to set up are Your Info; How Your Info is Displayed; Forums to Track via Email.
My Posts Icon My Posts: Use this button to view all your posts at once

User Login

Forgot Password ?

Wrongfully Convicted by DNA...It Could Happen to You!
  Gary Is Innocent  Discussions  General  Why complicate this? Clearly this man should be free
Previous Previous
Next Next
New Post 11/16/2011 11:49 PM
1 posts
No Ranking

Why complicate this? Clearly this man should be free 
Modified By suz88  on 11/17/2011 10:44:08 AM)

I just watched 48 hrs regrading this case. The whole case hinged on DNA. Just because there is DNA evidence it doesn't mean it is reliable. People test the evidence and people make mistakes.

I think sometimes people want to make something more complicated than it is. They would rather believe a man picked up a 4 yr old stranger, drove 40 miles, raped and killed another stranger, cut the 4 yr old and placed his blood on the victim's hand and then drove 40 miles and dropped off the apparantly unmissed child who made no mention of his harrowing experience.

How about looking at facts instead of trying to connect bizarre supposed "evidence". In 2002, A commited murderer's blood was at a lab. Nothing happened when he was four. He is only linked to the victim after his blood was close to her pantyhose in 2002 (many years after the crime took place). The victims cold case detective had sent the hose to the same lab for examination. Also coincidently this same lab had Gary's DNA from a buccal swab for something completely unrelated that also occured many years after the victim was killed. These specimens had nothing to do with each other but are all in the same lab at the same time. What are the odds that DNA from 3 people involved in a crime happen to be in the same lab some 30+ years later for unrelated reasons. I can't even imagine!!!

It is obvious to me that cross contamination took place. It is the simplest and most reasonable conclusion. I was simply shocked that this man was convicted. Why has the verdict not yet been overturned?!!! Gary should not just be set free. He deserves a huge settlement from the legal system and the lab that will not admit the obvious. I have no reason to stand up for Gary and have never posted on something like this before but this situation is disgraceful!!!

Good luck Gary. I hope this hell is soon behind you.

Previous Previous
Next Next
  Gary Is Innocent  Discussions  General  Why complicate this? Clearly this man should be free
Print  Minimize